Court of justice of the European Union

Evaluation of the European Commission’s Conclusions in the 2018 Report on Intellectual Property Law in Turkey

I. Introduction

The European Commission (“Commission”) has released a report on April 17, 2018, which contained crucial findings of simple fact and assessments with regards to Turkey’s political problem, economic improvement, regional difficulties and global obligations. This document summarizes and evaluates the conclusions put forth by the Commission in its report (“Report”) with respect to intellectual assets legislation in Turkey and its solutions for the coming years.

II. Recent Status of Intellectual Home Law in Turkey

Chapter seven of the Report examines the condition of intellectual assets legislation in Turkey and declares that “Turkey has a great stage of preparing in the area.” The Commission has preferred to use the word “great” in purchase to emphasize that though the present stage of preparing is ample, there is continue to space for improvement. The Report also underlines the simple fact that great progress has been designed on authorized alignment with the European Unionacquis.

In purchase to assess the progress that has been designed by Turkey in this certain area, it would be beneficial to look at this Report with the former report of the Commission. The former report, which was released in 2016, mentioned that “there was some progress in improving upon administrative capability and coordination but enforcement remained problematic.” The former report also proposed that Turkey really should adopt pending industrial assets and copyright laws in line with the EU acquis. On the other hand, the Report of 2018 states that the adoption and entry into pressure of the new Industrial Home Law is a substantial element of the “great progress” that the Report has recognized. This is one of the most useful and noteworthy developments with regards to intellectual assets legislation in Turkey, as the Commission has also underlined in its Report.

The Report gives further facts on this situation and signifies that this new legislation allows and presents increased authorized alignment among Turkish IP legislation and the EU intellectual assets rights acquis in relation to emblems and designs. Furthermore, it updates the Turkish intellectual assets legal rights procedure in line with global agreements and tactics. Compared with the former report, the Report of 2018 also notes that simplified registration processes have been released by the new legislation. Even so, the Report also highlights the (disappointing) simple fact that the new legislation lacks certain provisions for biotechnological innovations.The Report also mentions that an Intellectual Home Rights Academy was established up in July 2017, which will be liable for all intellectual assets legal rights schooling for civil servants in Turkey. Thus, the Regulation on the Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Measures for Trademark and Patent Brokers, which entered into pressure in May perhaps 2017, addresses a authorized hole with regard to the liability of trademark and patent agents registered with the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. Last but not least, the Report observes that the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office has strengthened its consultation on trademark registration companies with proprietors of intellectual assets legal rights and their representatives.

III. Advisable Steps to Be Taken

The Report implies that a few (three) methods really should be taken by Turkish lawmakers and community authorities in the approaching years with respect to the safety of intellectual assets legal rights. The Commission recommends that Turkey really should acquire the next concrete methods:

(i) Undertake pending copyright laws in line with the acquis:

The former report of 2016 also encouraged that Turkey really should acquire a few (three) methods in the coming years for the authorized safety of intellectual assets legal rights. The to start with one was the adoption of the pending industrial assets and copyright legislations in line with the European Union acquis.

The to start with half of this move was fulfilled with the passage of the new Industrial Home Law. Even so, the Report of 2018 now states that Turkey really should adopt, in certain, pending copyright laws in line with the acquis, which is the Draft Law Amending the Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Inventive Performs (“Draft Law”).

The Draft Law proposes several amendments to the present textual content of the Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Inventive Performs, which incorporate revisions to the provisions regarding on the internet piracy, accumulating societies, databases and fantastic works by using, this sort of as non permanent reproductions, replica by photocopying and other comparable implies, freedoms for needs of use by disabled people, and non permanent reproductions by radio or television enterprises.

The Report precisely highlights this situation by stating that, “Collective legal rights administration remains an outstanding situation that the new copyright legislation really should tackle, specifically in relation to foreign producers, community functionality legal rights and replica legal rights.” The Draft Law actually focuses on the situation of replica legal rights nevertheless, it does not precisely tackle treatment method of foreign producers and community functionality legal rights. For this reason, in purchase to be brought in line with the suggestions of the Commission, the Draft Law (or other laws) really should incorporate and incorporate these legal rights as well.

A different encouraged move in the former (2016) report was to improve enforcement steps in fighting versus piracy and counterfeiting. When the Draft Law enters into authorized pressure, the Intellectual Home laws in Turkey will finally tackle the situation of piracy.

(ii) Make improvements to enforcement steps to overcome infringements of industrial and intellectual assets legal rights:

When the new Industrial Home Law aims to produce a greater stage of authorized alignment with the EU Enforcement Directive, that is continue to not considered ample by the Report. Considering that the selection of intellectual assets correct infringements and the stage of counterfeiting and piracy things to do are continue to really large in Turkey, the Report implies that the implementation of the accelerated destruction procedure and the successful functioning of the prison justice procedure in dealing with intellectual assets legal rights have to have to be enhanced.

(iii) Maintain a constructive dialogue with intellectual assets correct (IPR) proprietors, maximize recognition with regards to counterfeiting and piracy and target on the gains of a robust IPR safety procedure for economic expansion:

The Report explicitly states that, “Turkey really should in certain, sustain a constructive dialogue with intellectual assets correct (IPR) proprietors, maximize recognition with regards to counterfeiting and piracy and target on the gains of a robust IPR safety procedure for economic expansion.” This suggestion, as soon as again, highlights the have to have for certain authorized provisions with regards to IPR proprietors, as well as addressing difficulties of counterfeiting and piracy, and it also raises an crucial point with regards to the software of the laws. In simple fact, this is the reason why Turkey may well not be in a position to stick to and abide by this advice in the coming years, due to the fact both of those the software and the enforcement of the relevant laws may possibly acquire some time and are probably to occur only steadily.

IV. Summary

The Report obviously signifies that the condition of Intellectual Home Law in Turkey has been enhanced due to the fact the launch of the former report, which was accomplished mainly by the adoption of the new Industrial Home Law. Even so, there are continue to a selection of difficulties and challenges that have to have to be addressed with respect to IP legislation in Turkey, which are highlighted in the Report, primarily in apply. In other words, though substantial optimistic methods have been taken with respect to IP laws in Turkey, the software and enforcement of the IP legal rights enshrined in this sort of laws continue to leaves a lot space for improvement.

Close